The True Cost of Meetings for Productivity and Profitability
Our research reveals the average time spent in meetings per week, the true productivity cost, and how TMetric helps auto-track and cut unproductive meetings.

Have you ever thought about how much money you lose as an agency owner on team meetings?
Our analysis of more than 2,500 service company employees (TMetric data, Jun-August 2025) reveals that meetings now consume 16.85% of productive capacity — the equivalent of hiring 17 full-time employees in a 100-person company and then locking them in conference rooms for the entire year.
Read on to see the full price tag, why it keeps rising, and how to claw the hours (and margin) back.
Key Takeaways
- 16.85 % of paid time is spent in meetings — equal to 6 h 45 m per employee every week.
- Average meeting length is 1 h 07 m, but only 28 % of that time is judged "productive".
- 73 % of people admit to multi-tasking during calls, driving a hidden context-switching cost.
- 60 % of employees have more meetings post-COVID than they did in 2019
- For a 100-person agency, 72% unproductive meeting time equals $100,800 wasted monthly.
- Teams average 1.69 meetings per day, fragmenting workdays into 3-4 blocks too short for deep work.
#1: 16.85 % of Working Time Vanishes into Meetings
Analysis of 2,582 service company employees shows meetings now consume 16.85% of total work time - nearly one-fifth of productive capacity.
What’s going on?
- Retainer clients now expect 3-5 "touch-base" calls monthly that weren't scoped in original agreements—adding 4-6 unbilled hours per account manager monthly.
- Creative & dev teams book recurring “syncs” instead of writing short Looms or comments in Figma/Slack; a 50-person company now spends 10-15x more time coordinating the same work
- Average call length grew 18% between February and August 2025 (from 57 to 67 minutes), even though meeting frequency stayed flat. Ten minutes per meeting doesn't sound like much - until you multiply it across hundreds of calls monthly.
Meeting Share of Work Week | Hours | % of Total Work | % of Active Work |
---|---|---|---|
Meeting time | 6,45 h | 16.85 % | 33.13 % |
Other work activities | 31,83 h | 83.15 % | 66.87 % |
Total work time tracked | 38,28 h | 100 % | — |
*Source: TMetric user data, Jan-August 2025
Teams Average at Least 1 Meeting Daily
TMetric logs show that users who record at least one call book 1.69 meetings every working day—that is 8.45 calls in a 5-day week.
What’s going on?
- A 60-minute meeting does not cost 60 minutes; it shatters the day into <90-minute fragments, killing deep-work thresholds.
- Creative and dev deliverables need unbroken 2-hour blocks for flow state; 1.69 daily staccato calls make that impossible.
- Agency PMs scatter client check-ins to “keep everyone aligned,” but the cognitive tax of context-switching doubles the real price.
Metric | Impact |
---|---|
Available deep-work blocks (≥90 min) | 0–1 per day |
Fragmented time chunks (<90 min) | 3–4 per day |
Usable focus time per chunk | 35–55 min |
Daily context-switching tax | 45–70 min |
What to do – 3-step playbook
- Map the heat map: run TMetric "Timeline" for two weeks; color-code calls vs focused tags.
- Introduce "Core-hours": no internal meetings before 1 pm on Mon/Wed/Fri; client calls still allowed but must be book-ended (back-to-back).
#2: Only 28 % of Meeting Minutes Create Value
Our 2025 TMetric sample shows fewer than 3 in every 10 meeting minutes create a trackable outcome.
The remaining 72 % evaporate in late starts, off-topic loops, and "quick" status that should have been Slack threads.
What’s going on?
- 16.85 % of the working week is already locked in calls (≈ 28 h per employee per month in a 100-seat agency)
- Apply the 28 % yield and only 7,8 h per person to deliver decisions, approvals, or next-step owners.
- The leftover 20.2 h per employee—2,020 hours monthly across 100 employees—are non-billable, non-strategic, non-recoverable.
Real Cost of Meetings
Meeting Time Value Breakdown (100-person agency, monthly) | Hours | Dollar Cost* |
---|---|---|
Total monthly meeting hours | 2,800 h | $140,000 |
Productive meeting time (28%) | 784 h | $39,200 |
Unproductive meeting time (72%) | 2,016 h | $100,800 |
Tiered Recovery Scenarios | ||
Conservative (25% reduction) | 504 h | $25,200 |
Moderate (40% reduction) | 806 h | $40,320 |
Aggressive (60% reduction) | 1,210 h | $60,480 |
*Based on fully-loaded employee cost of $50/hour (salary + benefits + overhead)
* Note that the numbers do not include the time managers have to spend on hunting and collecting for information they need in meetings — scouring the web, trawling LinkedIn, rereading old meeting notes, and combing through email.
What to do – 4-step playbook
- Tag all client-facing meetings with project codes in TMetric
- Separate "billable consulting" (strategic planning, reviews) from "internal coordination"
- Industry benchmark: 28% of service companies bill discovery, strategy, and executive review time at 0.75-1.0x their standard rate
- Run monthly "Meeting P&L" report: Total cost vs. billable recovery
#3. 73 % Multitask During Meetings—The “Invisible Billable” Leak
Industry research on workplace productivity (corroborated by TMetric user behavior patterns) shows 73% of attendees admit to side-tasking once a call passes the 15-minute mark.
What’s going on?
- Over-inclusion is the default: average 9.2 invitees per call in our data, yet only 3.4 people speak.
- The silent 60-70 % stay on “mute-camera-off” autopilot, billing internal codes while actually answering client emails or tweaking Figma files.
- Result: time-tracking noise—hours hit “Overhead/Meetings,” real effort lands on client projects, so margin reports lie and under-scoped retainers look profitable.
The Hidden Cost of Meeting Multitasking (100-person agency) | Monthly Impact |
---|---|
Total monthly meeting hours | 2,800 h |
Meetings where 73% multitask | 2,044 h |
Estimated dual-task time (conservative) | 1,022 h |
Projects with inaccurate time allocation | 60–80 % |
Misreported project costs | $25,000–$51,000 |
Assumes 50% of multitasking time is spent on client work during internal meetings, at $50 loaded rate
What to do – 3-step playbook
- Required role tag in every invite: Decision-Owner, Contributor, Optional. TMetric filters optional attendees; they auto-decline.
- Camera-on policy for the first 5 min to confirm relevance, then free-to-leave window.
- Dual-timer block: If TMetric detects simultaneous "Meeting" + “Client-X Design” timers, flag for manager review and reassign hours to the real project.
#4. Post-COVID Calendar Bloat: 60 % More Meetings, 0 % More Output
Owl Labs' 2021 Webcam Survey documented a 60% jump in meeting frequency versus 2019 baselines — a trend our 2025 TMetric data confirms has persisted rather than reversed.
What’s going on?
- What started as a required adjustment to continue cooperation has frozen into indestructible calendar fat. Teams that used to speak rapidly through the halls now make 15-minute Meets/Teams/Zooms to have the same exchange.
- Managers worry that without regular check-ins, they'll lose touch with team progress.
- Team members fear that being less visible means being overlooked for opportunities.
- The result: calendars packed with status updates, stand-ups, one-on-ones, and "quick syncs" that together consume 7-10 hours weekly. Middle managers and project leads bear the heaviest burden, attending multiple meetings daily that fragment focus.
Meeting Volume: Pre vs Post-COVID | Meetings / Week | Weekly Hours |
---|---|---|
Pre-COVID baseline (2019) | ~8 | ~9 |
Post-COVID (2021-2025) | ~13 | ~14 |
Increase | +62.5 % | +55.6% % |
Source: The Webcam Survey Full Report (2021)
What to do—4-step playbook:
- Conduct a 30-day audit with TMetric: Filter recurring meetings with 3+ attendees. Calculate the cost: Duration × Blended Rate. Identify the lowest-value 20% for elimination
- Implement client-only meeting days: Try scheduling external calls on specific days (e.g., Tuesday/Thursday)
- Set a 4-person default cap: Configure meeting templates in Outlook/Google Calendar to flag invites exceeding 4 participants for manager approval
- Apply async-first communication: Move status updates to Loom videos, Slack, or Notion; reserve live calls for decisions requiring same-day resolution
What Makes a Meeting Productive?
A meeting is only expensive if it doesn’t pay for itself.
Productive ones share four non-negotiables:
#1. Single-sentence purpose printed in the invite—if you can’t finish the sentence “By the end of this call we will have ___,” cancel it.
#2. Agenda as bullet-point clock: topic + owner + max minutes (e.g., “Budget sign-off – Maya – 10 min”). Share 24 h ahead so silent attendees can pre-read.
#3. 4-person default cap; every extra name costs ~$50 per 15 min in loaded cost. If someone’s role is “FYI,” send the recording instead.
#4. Live artifact: exit with a decision log in Notion or Google Doc—owner + due-date next to each action. No doc = meeting didn’t happen.
Skip any one of these and the 28 % productivity rate drops to zero; nail all four and you’ve bought back a day of deep work every week.
Summary
TMetric data from 2,500 workers shows the average week bleeds 16.85 % of its hours into meetings, and 72 % of those minutes evaporate without a trace of output—an invisible leak that drains more than $1.2 M a year from a 100-person shop.
The usual suspects: crammed calendars, split-screen attention, and agenda-free chatter.
Flip the script with TMetric's automatic meeting tracking: spot the waste, price every minute, and claw back a quarter of the focus that meetings steal.

FAQs
How does TMetric calculate my real meeting productivity cost?
It multiplies the exact call seconds by the user’s hourly cost rate pulled from the Projects module and rolls the figure into client or overhead buckets.
You can then review these costs in the Time & Costs report to decide whether future meetings are billable or should be trimmed.
Can TMetric actually help me cut unproductive meetings, not just measure them?
Yes—set billable vs non-billable meeting tags, share cost dashboards with client-facing PMs, and create automation rules that flag any recurring call >45 min without an agenda.
Is tracking automatic for my team, or will this add admin work?
Once the Zoom/Teams/Google Calendar integration is enabled, TMetric auto-starts a timer on the "Meeting in progress" window—zero clicks required.
Why use TMetric instead of basic timesheets or calendar analytics?
Calendar tools show duration; TMetric links duration to hourly cost, client project, margin, and utilization in one screen built for agencies.
It also turns that live data into one-click invoices and payroll exports, so you bill faster and never leave billable hours on the table.
Sources & Methodology
✅The data that we used
They were anonymized aggregations of the 250 TMetric users who made at least one call that was tracked in the period of July 2025.
Its data was comprised of 19.96 million seconds of call time, 118.49 million seconds of total work time, and 60.25 million seconds of active work time (without the periods of idle time).
We also analyzed weekly meeting patterns from February through August 2025, tracking meeting frequency, duration, and distribution across 2,582 users with any time tracking activity.
✅Call detection filter
Descriptions that include "Zoom Meeting", "Microsoft Teams", or "Google Meet", and general "meeting" descriptors.
✅External Research Sources
- MyHours Meeting Statistics 2025 (for meeting statistics on meeting productivity and frequency)
- Fellow.app Meeting Statistics (analysis of meeting optimization strategies and techniques of reductions)
- The Webcam Survey Full Report (2021) (analysis of post-COVID meeting trends)
✅Financial Model
All financial impact calculations used representative industry averages for agency environments with 50-150 employees.
Ready to see your own meeting numbers?
Start with automatic meeting tracking in TMetric, run the cost report, and let the real numbers decide which calls stay on the calendar.
Import your calendar to TMetric today and find out how many billable hours you can rescue this month.